Samsung officially introduced the Galaxy S III a few hours ago and the smartphone is already controversial among Android enthusiasts.
Most people are currently
complaining about the phone's
design or hardware performance,
though the handset has just been
announced.
Others are calling the Galaxy S III
“ecstatic” when it comes to design,
but they say it has the same
performance as other Android
phones already available on the
market.
Well, it looks like the folks over at
GSMArena have been quick enough to
run some tests and the results are
impressive, to say the least.
Samsung Galaxy S III was put against
HTC One X, HTC One S, Samsung
Galaxy S II, Samsung Galaxy Nexus,
Sony Xperia S, Samsung Galaxy Note,
HTC Sensation XE, Samsung Galaxy
Note 10.1 and Apple iPhone 4S.
Before seeing the actual numbers, let's recap the Galaxy S III hardware
configuration. Samsung's super-
phone is powered by Android 4.0.4
Ice Cream Sandwich operating system
and packs an Exynos 4212 Quad
chipset that features four processors
clocked at 1.4 GHz.
In addition, the smartphone sports a
Mali-400MP graphics processing unit
and the usual 1GB of RAM. It is also
worth mentioning Galaxy S III boasts
a stunning 4.8-inch Pentile display
that supports HD (720 x 1280 pixels)
resolution (306 ppi).
Three apps have been used to
benchmark Samsung Galaxy S III
performance: Quadrant, SunSpider
and BrowserMark. Unsurprisingly,
Samsung's super-phone managed to
beat all other devices on all three
benchmarks.
For example, the Galaxy S III scored 5642 points on Quadrant, while HTC One
S came second at 5047 points. HTC
One X (4842 points), Samsung Galaxy
Note (3531 points), Sony Xperia S
(3173 points), Samsung Galaxy S II
(3053 points) and Samsung Galaxy
Nexus (2316 points) complete the list
of tested devices.
The other two benchmarks prove that
Samsung Galaxy S III might just be the
most powerful Android smartphone
available on the market. However, it's
a bit too early to give Galaxy S III the
crown, so we're waiting for more tests
to be run in the following days.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave Your Comment :